|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Modified Robotic Lightweight Endoscope (ViKY) Validation In Vivo in a Porcine Model
Andrew A. Gumbs, MD
Department of Digestive Diseases, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, University René Descartes Paris V, Paris, France
Fernando Crovari, MD,
Department of Digestive Diseases, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, University René Descartes Paris V, Paris, France
Clement Vidal, PhD
Department of Digestive Diseases, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, University René Descartes Paris V, Paris, France
Patrick Henri
Department of Digestive Diseases, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, University René Descartes Paris V, Paris, France
Brice Gayet, MD, PhD
Department of Digestive Diseases, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, University René Descartes Paris V, Paris, France, brice.gayet{at}imm.fr
The added precision and steadiness of a robotically held camera enables the performance of more complex procedures laparoscopically. In contrast to typical laparoscope holders, the modified lightweight robotic endoscope, the ViKY system is particularly compact, simple to set up and use, and occupies no floor space. Ease and safety of setup was confirmed in a porcine model and several common general surgical procedures were performed. The sterilizable endoscope manipulator is sufficiently small to be placed directly on the operating room table without interfering with other handheld instruments during minimally invasive surgery. The endoscope manipulator and its user interface were tested and evaluated by several surgeons during a series of 5 minimally invasive surgical training procedures in a porcine model. The endoscope manipulator described has been shown to be a practical device with performance and functionality equivalent to those of commercially available models, yet with greatly reduced size, weight, and cost.
Key Words: endoscope manipulator robotic ViKY system voice-controlled
References
- Vara-Thorbeck C., Munoz VF, Toscano R., et al. A new robotic endoscope manipulator. A preliminary trial to evaluate the performance of a voice-operated industrial robot and a human assistant in several simulated and real endoscopic operations. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:924-927.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Wagner A., Varkarakis I., Link R., Sullivan W., Su L. Comparison of surgical performance during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy of two robotic camera holders, EndoAssist and AESOP: A pilot study. Urology. 2006;68: 70-74.[Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Mettler L., Ibrahim M., Jonat W. One year of experience working with the aid of a robotic assistant (the voice-controlled optic holder AESOP) in gynaecological endoscopic surgery. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:2748-2750.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Tanoue K., Yasunaga T., Kobayashi E., et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy using a newly developed laparoscope manipulator for 10 patients with cholelithiasis. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:753-756.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Dunlap KD, Wanzer L. Is the robotic arm a cost-effective surgical tool? AORN J. 1998;68:265-272.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Aiono S., Gilbert JM, Soin B., Finlay PA, Gordan A. Controlled trial of the introduction of a robotic camera assistant (EndoAssist) for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:1267-1270.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Long JA, Cinquin P., Troccaz J., et al. Preclinical development of the TIMC LER (light endoscope robot) [in French]. Prog Urol. 2006;16:45-51.[Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Proske JM, Dagher I., Franco D. Comparative study of human and robotic camera control in laparoscopic biliary and colon surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2004;14:345-348.[Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Rasmus M., Riener R., Reiter S., Schneider A., Feussner H. In vivo kinematic measurement during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:1649-1656.[Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Surgical Innovation, Vol. 14, No. 4,
261-264 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1553350607310281

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
|
|