|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Validation of the NITI Endoluminal Compression Anastomosis Ring (EndoCAR) Device and Comparison to the Traditional Circular Stapled Colorectal Anastomosis in a Porcine Model
David Stewart, MD
Department of Surgery, Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
Steven Hunt, MD
Department of Surgery, Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
Richard Pierce, MD, PhD
Department of Surgery, Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
Dongli Mao, MD
Department of Surgery, Section of Vascular Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
Margaret Frisella, RN
Kathryn Cook, LVT
Institute of Minimally Invasive Surgery Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
Barry Starcher, PhD
University of Texas Health Center at Tyler Texas
James Fleshman, MD
Department of Surgery, Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, fleshman{at}wudosis.wustl.edu
The purpose of this study was to determine whether the characteristics of compression anastomoses created by a new device are comparable to existing stapler technology. A total of 18 pigs were studied, and each served as its own control using a 27-mm compression device and a 29-mm stapler. Anastomoses were randomized to proximal and distal positions along the rectum and were separated by 10 cm. Six nonsurvival pigs were sacrificed at zero time to failure test the anastomoses. Twelve pigs were sacrificed at 14 days. Failure pressures, circumferences, and radiographic leak rates were determined. Anastomotic tissue was processed for matrix metalloproteinase, collagen, and elastin levels. The compression anastomoses had higher mean failure pressures than stapled anastomoses at zero time (103 vs 29.9 mm Hg). At 2 weeks, there was no difference between failure pressures (256 vs 250 mm Hg). During burst testing, 3 of the compression anastomoses failed at the anastomosis at 2 weeks, whereas none of the stapled anastomoses failed. The mean anastomotic circumference of the compression anastomoses was narrower than the stapled anastomoses (9.63 vs 11.25 cm, P = .001). There were no clinical leaks or radiographic leaks by barium enema at 2 weeks. There was no difference between matrix metalloproteinase, collagen, or elastin content based on tissue analysis. There were dense adhesions to 7 of 12 (58.3%) of the stapled anastomoses, whereas only 1 of 12 (8.3%) of the compression anastomoses had flimsy adhesions. A new compression anastomosis technique using a nickel-titanium alloy may be an advance in technology by reducing leaks and eliminating foreign material in the anastomosis.
Key Words: compression stapled anastomosis nitinol colorectal
References
- National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Web site. http://www.seer.cancer.gov. Accessed September 2007.
- Docherty JG, McGregor JR, Akyol AM, et al. Comparison of manually constructed and stapled anastomoses on colorectal surgery: West of Scotland and Highland Anastomosis Study Group. Ann Surg. 1995; 221:176-184.[Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Senagore A., Milsom JW, Walshaw RK, et al. Direct comparison between Czerny-Lembert and circular-stapled anastomotic techniques in colorectal anastomosis: a similar pattern of healing for both. Dis Colon Rectum. 1992;35:862-869.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Ceraldi CM, Rypins EB, Monahan M., et al. Comparison of continuous single layer polypropylene anastomoses with double layer and stapled anastomoses in elective colon resections. Am Surg. 1993;59:168-171.[Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Beart RW, Kelly KA Randomized prospective evaluation of the EEA stapler for colorectal anastomoses. Am J Surg. 1981;141:143-147.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Kusunoki M., Ikeuchi H., Yanagi H., et al. A comparison of stapled and hand-sewn anastomoses in Crohn's disease. Dig Surg. 1998;15:679-682.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Yamamoto T., Bain IM, Mylonakis E., et al. Stapled function end-to-end anastomosis versus sutured end-to-end anastomosis after ileocolonic resection in Crohn's disease. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1999;34:708-713.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Scher KS, Scott-Conner C., Jones CW, et al. A comparison of stapled and sutured anastomoses in colonic operations. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1982;155:489-493.[Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Pahlman L., Ejerblad S., Graf W., et al. Randomized trial of a biofragmentable bowel anastomosis ring in high-risk colonic resection. Br J Surg. 1997;84:1291-1294.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Wullstein C., Gross E. Compression anastomosis (AKA-2) in colorectal surgery: results in 442 consecutive patients. Br J Surg. 200;87:1071-1075.
- Moran BJ Stapling instruments for intestinal anastomosis in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 1996;83:902-909.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Hardy KJ Non-suture anastomosis: the historical development. Aust N Z J Surg. 1990;60:625-633.[Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Murphy JB Cholecysto-intestinal, gastrointestinal, enterointestinal anastomoses and approximation without sutures. Med Rec. 1892;42:665-676.
- Oxlund H., Christensen H., Seyer-Hansen M., et al. Collagen deposition and mechanical strength of colon anastomoses and skin Incisional wounds of rats. J Surg Res. 1996;66:25-30.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Ornstein D., Cohn K. Balance between activation and inhibition of matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) is altered in colorectal tumors compared to normal colonic epithelium. Dig Dis Sci. 2002;47:1821-1830.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Ravitch MM, Rivarola A. Entero-anastomosis with an automatic instrument. Surgery. 1966;59:270-277.[Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Waxman BP, Yii MK, Pahlman L. Stapling in colorectal surgery. In: Mazier WP, ed. Surgery of the Colon, Rectum and Anus. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1995.
Surgical Innovation, Vol. 14, No. 4,
252-260 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1553350607312241

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
|
|