|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Classification of Hiatal Hernias Using Dynamic Three-Dimensional Reconstruction
Stephen M. Kavic, MD
University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, MD
Ross D. Segan, MD
Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, HI
Ivan M. George, MD
Patricia L. Turner, MD
J. Scott Roth, MD
University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, MD
Adrian Park, MD
Division of General Surgery, University of Maryland Baltimore, Rm S4B14, 22 South Greene Street, Baltimore, MD 21201 apark{at}smail.umaryland.edu
Hiatal hernias and paraesophageal hernias are common clinical entities and have a well-known classification system. Multiple modalities have been used to illustrate these hernias, most relying on artists renderings or two-dimensional radiographic studies. However, surgeons would benefit from a comprehensive graphic representation of hiatal hernias based on current imaging technologies. We have applied polygonal mesh surface modeling techniques to render dynamic three-dimensional computed tomography-based models of the four recognized types of hiatal hernias. The resulting images allow nearly real-time navigation in an intuitive and clinically relevant fashion. This model should clarify and eventually advance the existing classification by applying modern and sophisticated image processing to established concepts.
Key Words: Hiatal hernia paraesophageal hernia classification computed tomography (CT)
References
- Barrett NR. Hiatus hernia: a review of some controversial points. Br J Surg 42:231-243, 1954.[Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Ellis FH. Diaphragmatic hiatal hernias: recognizing and treating the major types. Postgrad Med 88:113-124, 1990.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Maish MS, DeMeester SR. Paraesophageal hiatal hernia. In Cameron JL, editor: Current Surgical Therapy, 8th edition. Philadelphia: Elsevier Mosby, 2004. pp 38-42.
- Maziak DE, Todd TRJ, Pearson FG. Massive hiatus hernia: evaluation and surgical management. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 115:43-62, 1998.
- Ellis FH. Esophageal hiatal hernia. N Engl J Med 287:646-649, 1972.[Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Blamey S. Classifying hiatus hernia. Does it make a difference to management? Aust Fam Physician 27:481-485, 1998.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Vas W, Malpani AR, Singer J, et al. Computed tomographic evaluation of paraesophageal hernia. Gastrointest Radiol 14:291-294, 1989.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- George I, Maley B, Stick J, et al. The use of CVAS in the first year and third year medical school. At: Society for Medical Innovation and Technology conference, 2002.
- Mastrangelo MJ, Adrales G, McKinlay R, et al. Inclusion of 3-D computed tomography rendering and immersive VR in a third year medical student surgery curriculum. Stud Health Technol Inform 94:199-203, 2003.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Mastrangelo MJ, George I, Witzke W, et al. Improving the utility of medical imaging for educational, clinical and research applications via augmented and virtual reality. At: Minimally invasive surgery stereoscopic grand rounds, Oslo, Norway, 2002.
- George I, Mastrangelo M, Hoskins J, et al. Using semi-automated image processing and desktop system to incorporate actual patient volumetric data in immersive surgical planning and viewing systems for multiple patients. In Westwood JD, Hoffman HM, Robb RA, Stredney D, editors:. Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 02/10. The Netherlands: IOS Press, 2002. pp. 155-159.
- Mastrangelo M, Adrales G, George I, et al. Advancements in immersive VR as a tool for preoperative planning for laparoscopic surgery. In Westwood JD, Hoffman HM, Robb RA, Stredney D, editors: Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 02/10. The Netherlands: IOS Press, 2002. pp 274-279.
- McKinlay R, Park A, Dunkle-Blatter S, et al. The use of 3D reconstruction in difficult foregut surgery: a novel technique providing anatomical delineation with clinical application. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 8:S28-S28, 2004.
Surgical Innovation, Vol. 13, No. 1,
49-52 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/155335060601300108

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
|
|