This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Iserson, K. V. Articles by Chiasson, P. M. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Iserson, K. V. Articles by Chiasson, P. M. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Ethics of Applying New Medical Technologies

kvi{at}u.arizona.edu, Arizona Bioethics Program and the Department of Surgery, UniUersity of Arizona, Tucson, AZ

Patrick M. Chiasson, MD, MA, FRCSC

Arizona Bioethics Program and the Department of Surgery, UniUersity of Arizona, Tucson, AZ

Medical technology itself, including minimally invasive surgery, has no morals; our morality revolves around when and how we use technology. This often involves the individual clinician's assessment of their own abilities and an awareness of two aspects of the technology : its proven efficacy and its safety. Is technology outpacing knowledge? Or do physicians adopt new technologies in a responsible way with good motives? No one knows for sure. Technological progress in medicine has been a mixed blessing. The only ethical element involved in the use of new technologies over which individual medical practitioners have control, is that of user proficiency with the device, procedure, or drug, and the related information they provide to their patients when obtaining their consent for its use. New technologies fall into two broad categories: evolutionary, the most common, and revolutionary, which occur sporadically and may completely change the face of medical care. The learning curve for all new technologies can be steep. So, when should physicians be permitted to use these new technologies without supervision ? Who is responsible for setting and monitoring standards for new technologies? With the moving target of medical technological innovation, individual practitioners are primarily responsible for the ethical use of new (to them) technologies. It is physicians' ethics that govern their use of new technologies, being certain that they have the requisite training and experience to use the modality, and that the intervention is safe for their patients. Institutional practitioner credentialing at the local level, despite its faults, will often be the primary control over a technology's use. What will ultimately govern the use of new technologies is the ethics (if they exist) of healthcare institutions and individuat practitioners, as well as patient need. This is simply another reason why ethics education is vital for physicians-and other health practitioners and healthcare administrators. Copyright 2002, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

Key Words: Ethics • technology • laparoscopy • surgery • innovation • minimally invasive surgery.

Surgical Innovation, Vol. 9, No. 4, 222-229 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/155335060200900407


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?