This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Sucher, J. F. Articles by MacFadyen, B. V. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Sucher, J. F. Articles by MacFadyen, B. V., JR Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Imaging Modalities for Acute Abdominal Pain

Department of Surgery, Uniuersity of Texas-Houston Health Sciences Center, Houston, TX

Bruce V. MacFadyen, JR, MD

Department of Surgery, Uniuersity of Texas-Houston Health Sciences Center, Houston, TX

The diagnosis of acute abdominal pain remains hinged on the performance of a careful history and physical exam. Five to ten million emergency department visits occur each year for acute abdominal pain, creating a need to achieve improved diagnostic accuracy in an expedient fashion. Technologies such as ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and diagnostic laparoscopy are helping achieve this goal. Of these, computed tomography appears to be the work horse of diagnostic imaging in the setting of acute abdominal pain. In this review, we examine each of these modalities, discussing their strengths and weaknesses. As well, we have reproduced an excellent algorithmic approach published by Martin and Rossi that shows the reader some basic diagnostic strategies for the evaluation of acute abdominal pain. Copyright 2002, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

Key Words: Imaging modalities • acute abdominal pain.

Surgical Innovation, Vol. 9, No. 1, 3-9 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/155335060200900102


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?