SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Surgical Innovation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alijani, A.
Right arrow Articles by Cuschieri, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Alijani, A.
Right arrow Articles by Cuschieri, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Abdominal Wall Lift Systems in Laparoscopic Surgery: Gasless and Low-pressure Systems

Afshin Alijani

Department of Surgery and Molecular Oncology, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland

Alfred Cuschieri, MD, ChM, FRSE, FRCS, F Acad Sci

a.cushieri{at}dundee.ac.uk, Department of Surgery and Molecular Oncology, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland

Positive pressure pneumoperitoneum (12 mm Hg) is associated with adverse physiologic effects that can prove detrimental to certain high-risk patients with diminished cardiorespiratory reserve. Mechanical abdominal wall lift (AWL) has been proposed as an alternative method of exposure in laparoscopic surgery to obviate or minimize these adverse physiologic effects, the risk of CO2 embolism in trauma patients, and tumor dissemination in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for cancer. This article reviews the systems available for AWL, the clinical applications of the technique, and the findings of the randomized controlled trials that compare AWL with conventional pneumoperitoneum. AWL systems do appear to reduce the adverse cardiovascular and respiratory effects, but they do so at the expense of surgical exposure, which is less optimal than that provided by the positive-pressure pneumoperitoneum. This reduced exposure increases the execution difficulty of the operation and, hence, the operating times. This problem is overcome by combination of AWL with low-pressure (3 to 4 mm Hg) pneumoperitoneum. This combination provides good surgical exposure without adverse cardiovascular consequences. Copyright © 2001 by W.B. Saunders Company.

Key Words: Positive-pressure pneumoperitoneum • abdominal wall lift • gasless laparoscopy.

Surgical Innovation, Vol. 8, No. 1, 53-62 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/155335060100800106


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement