SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Surgical Innovation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fletcher, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fletcher, D. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Operative Cholangiogram at Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

David R. Fletcher, MBBS (WA), MD (Melb), FRACS

Department of Surgery, University of Western Australia, and Fremantle Hospital, Fremantle, WA, Australia

In the open cholecystectomy era, the established principle for treating biliary calculi was to perform intraoperative cholangiography to diagnose and treat the concomitant common duct stone at the time of cholecystectomy. To reduce unnecessary cholangiograms, a selective cholangiogram policy based on preoperative and operative criteria was sometimes used. Although both time and cost were saved, a 4% to 10% chance of missing unsuspected common duct stones was associated with this policy. The introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Australia initially led to an abandonment of the principles of biliary surgery. Rates of intraoperative cholangiography declined as stones were either ignored or diagnosed preoperatively by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and/or intravenous cholangiography. When stones were identified, they were treated by preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy. This decline in cholangiography was associated with a twofold to fourfold rise in serious bile duct injury as well as a delay in its diagnosis. Over the past two years, as laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become established in Australia, practice is returning to the standards of the open cholecystectomy era. Intraoperative cholangiography rates have been increasing along with the proportion of patients having their duct stones removed laparoscopically. To succeed, this practice depends on the use of fluoroscopic cholangiography, which should be the standard of care in the laparoscopic era. With laparoscopic cholecystectomy, intraoperative cholangiography is no longer optional, but mandatory. Not only does it reduce the incidence and severity of bile duct injury, but it also trains the surgeon to develop techniques of laparoscopic duct exploration.

Key Words: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy • operative cholangiogram • operative biliary trauma • choledocholithiasis • intravenous cholangiogram • ERCP • endoscopic sphincterotomy.

Surgical Innovation, Vol. 2, No. 2, 111-117 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/155335069500200206


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement