SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Surgical Innovation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1553350609339169v1
16/3/258    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ehrenfeld, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sandberg, W. S.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ehrenfeld, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sandberg, W. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Implementation of a Direct-From-Recovery-Room Discharge Pathway: A Process Improvement Effort

Jesse M. Ehrenfeld, MD, MPH

Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts

Andreas R. Seim, PhD

Department of Computer and Information Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway

David L. Berger, MD

Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts

Warren S. Sandberg, MD, PhD

Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, wsandberg{at}partners.org

Background. The authors describe a process improvement effort to achieve direct-from-recovery-room discharge for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients— without prior patient selection. Methods. The authors developed and implemented a new pathway, and then measured the learning curve (ie, success rate over time for direct discharge) and compared patients achieving direct discharge with patients admitted after surgery. Results. The learning curve between the first patient and steady-state performance was 56 patients. A total of 80% of patients achieved direct discharge. Directly discharged patients were younger (P < .001), had lower ASA physical status classifications (P < .005), and left the recovery room earlier in the day (P < .0001). However, elderly patients and those with high ASA scores frequently could be directly discharged from the recovery room. Conclusions. Through small team based rapid cycle process improvement, direct-from-recovery-room discharge of laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients can be achieved in an unselected patient population with a short learning curve.

Key Words: ambulatory surgery • laparoscopic cholecystectomy • patient selection • process improvement

This version was published on September 1, 2009

Surgical Innovation, Vol. 16, No. 3, 258-265 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1553350609339169


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement