| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Gastrectomy and Esophagogastrectomy for Proximal and Distal Gastric Lesions: A Comparison of Open and Laparoscopic ProceduresCentre for Minimal Access Surgery, Department of Surgery, St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, francev{at}mcmaster.ca
Centre for Minimal Access Surgery, Department of Surgery, St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton
Centre for Minimal Access Surgery, Department of Surgery, St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton
Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Centre for Minimal Access Surgery, Department of Surgery, St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton Laparoscopic gastrectomy is safe for benign lesions; however, such surgery for cancer remains controversial. The aim of this study is to compare outcomes in open versus laparoscopic gastrectomy. Data on patients undergoing open (n = 15) or laparoscopic (n = 52) gastrectomy revealed a mean age of 61.7 and 70.5 years, respectively (P = .06). Mean operative time was 32.3 minutes longer in the laparoscopic group (P = .24). The difference in median length of hospital stay was 3 days (open 12 days, laparoscopic 9 days). Postoperative morbidity (< 30 days) was not different; however, there were more early respiratory complications in the open group (P = .009). There were 4/6 (66.7%) open and 2/29 (6.9%) cancer recurrences. Laparoscopic approach for treatment of gastric lesions is safe and does not have a deleterious effect on cancer-related outcome.
Key Words: gastrectomy laparoscopy gastric cancer survival
This version was published on June
1, 2009 Surgical Innovation, Vol. 16, No. 2,
134-139 (2009) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||