SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Surgical Innovation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1553350608330712v1
16/1/9    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clark, J.
Right arrow Articles by Athanasiou, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clark, J.
Right arrow Articles by Athanasiou, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Natural Orifice Translumenal Thoracoscopic Surgery

Does the Slow Progress and the Associated Risks Affect Feasibility and Potential Clinical Applications?

James Clark, MRCS

Department of Biosurgery and Surgical Technology, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom, j.clark{at}imperial.ac.uk

Mikael Sodergren, MRCS

Department of Biosurgery and Surgical Technology, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom

Jorge Correia-Pinto, PhD

Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), University of Minho, Braga, Portugal

Emmanouil Zacharakis, PhD

Department of Biosurgery and Surgical Technology, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom

Julian Teare, FRCP

Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial Healthcare Trust, London, United Kingdom

Guang-Zhong Yang, PhD

Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Imperial College London, United Kingdom

Ara Darzi, KBE

Department of Biosurgery and Surgical Technology, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom

Thanos Athanasiou, PhD

Department of Biosurgery and Surgical Technology, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom

Context. Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is an emerging new technique but with much of the focus for the clinical applications of this technique centered on the abdomen. Concequently, its adaptation to the chest has been overlooked. The evidence for safe access, periprocedural complications and potential thoracic applications needs to be evaluated. Objective. This study systematically reviews the evidence for the feasibility and potential clinical applications of natural orifice translumenal thoracoscopic surgery. Data sources. MEDLINE and the Cochrane central database of controlled trials, from the earliest available date to July 2008. Study selection and data extraction. All studies evaluating the use of NOTES involving the thoracic cavity or structures therein were identified. The minimum inclusion criterion for each study was the extraction of discernible trial data. No restrictions were placed on language. Results. The literature search identified 197 citations. Review of abstracts led to 10 full-text articles for assessment; 7 articles were considered for this review, reporting on a total of 37 cases. All cases used the porcine model in both survival (7 to 42 days; mean 16; n = 5) and nonsurvival studies (n = 2). Mortality was 5% (n = 2) and morbidity 19% (n = 7); histopathological leak was detected on autopsy in 1 case. Conclusion. No human trials have currently been performed using NOTES within the thoracic cavity. There is a wide diversity of clinical applications from which cardiothoracic surgery could potentially benefit. There is a great deal of technical improvement that is still required before the technique is viable as an alternative surgical approach in humans.

Key Words: natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery • natural orifice surgery • natural orifice thoracic surgery • NOTES • minimally invasive surgery

This version was published on March 1, 2009

Surgical Innovation, Vol. 16, No. 1, 9-15 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1553350608330712


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement