This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1553350609331397v1 16/1/26    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hiles, M. Articles by Altizer, A. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hiles, M. Articles by Altizer, A. M. Pubmed/NCBI databases Substance via MeSH Medline Plus Health Information Hernia Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Are Biologic Grafts Effective for Hernia Repair?

A Systematic Review of the Literature

Cook Biotech Incorporated, West Lafayette, Indiana, mhiles{at}cookbiotech.com

Rae D. Record Ritchie, PhD

RDRR Biotech Consulting, Lafayette, Indiana

Alicia M. Altizer, PhD

Cook Biotech Incorporated, West Lafayette, Indiana

Biologic grafts for hernia repair are a relatively new development in the world of surgery. A thorough search of the Medline database for uses of various biologic grafts in hernia shows that the evidence behind their application is plentiful in some areas (ventral, inguinal) and nearly absent in others (parastomal). The assumption that these materials are only suited for contaminated or potentially contaminated surgical fields is not borne out in the literature, with more than 4 times the experience being reported in clean fields and the average success rates being higher (93% vs 87%). Outcomes prove to be highly dependent on material source, processing methods and implant scenarios with failure rates ranging from zero to more than 30%. Small intestinal submucosa (SIS) grafts have an aggregate failure rate of 6.7% at 19 months whereas acellular human dermis (AHD) grafts have a failure rate of 13.6% at 12 months. Chemically cross-linked grafts have much less published data than the non-cross-linked materials. In particular, the search found 33 articles for SIS, 32 for AHD, and 13 for cross-linked porcine dermis. Furthermore, the cumulative level of evidence for each graft material was fairly low (2.6 to 2.9), and only 1 material (SIS) had level 1 evidence reported in any hernia type (inguinal and hiatal). Together, biologic grafts have published evidence showing success rates better than 90% overall and more than 2000 years of cumulative implant time. Improvements in materials, techniques, and patient selection are likely to improve these numbers as this field of surgery matures.

Key Words: systematic review • hernia • biologic grafts • hernia repair

This version was published on March 1, 2009

Surgical Innovation, Vol. 16, No. 1, 26-37 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1553350609331397


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?