This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Williams, C. P. Articles by Ponsky, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Williams, C. P. Articles by Ponsky, J. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Objective Analysis of the Accuracy and Efficacy of a Novel Fascial Closure Device

University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio

Michael J. Rosen, MD

University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, michael.rosen{at}uhhospitals.org

Judy Jin, MD

University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio

Michael F. McGee, MD

University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio

Steve J. Schomisch, BS

University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio

Jeffery Ponsky, MD

University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio

Abdominal fascial closure after midline laparotomy can be time-consuming and inaccurate and is a common time for needle-stick injuries. The SuturTek 360° Fascial Closure Device (FCD) is designed to provide a secure fascial closure while reducing the risk of needle-stick injury. To date, the accuracy and efficacy of the fascial closure obtained with this device have never been objectively determined. Ten pigs averaging 18 kg were killed and underwent a midline laparotomy. Idealized suture locations were premarked through the fascia. The animals were then randomly assigned to either a traditional suture closure or the FCD for fascial closure. Surgeons were instructed to place sutures through the idealized markers. Surgeons were then evaluated based on the time to close fascia and distance from the markers. Abdominal bursting pressures were obtained using a manometric balloon. Accuracy was also tested on an ex vivo model on which the participants were again asked to place stitches as close as possible to idealized marks, and absolute distance from the idealized location was calculated. The FCD resulted in a faster closure time when compared with traditional closure (5.9 ± 0.6 vs 7.7 ± 1.0 minute, P = .012), with a similar accuracy of placement from the idealized markers (1.5 ± 1.4 mm vs 0.8 ± 1.1 mm). Bursting pressures were similar between the 2 groups: 470 ± 71 mm Hg for FCD versus 453 ± 94 mm Hg for traditional closure ( P = .76). The FCD resulted in a faster fascial closure with similar accuracy and strength when compared with traditional open techniques. The potential reduction in serious needle-stick injuries warrants prospective trials.

Key Words: Fascial closure • dehiscence • ventral hernia • suture device • needle stick

Surgical Innovation, Vol. 15, No. 4, 307-311 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1553350608327168


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?