SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Surgical Innovation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1553350608323725v1
15/4/302    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Madan, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Harper, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Madan, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Harper, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Patient Perception of Medicare Fee Schedule of Laparoscopic Procedures

Atul K. Madan, MD, FACS

Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, atulkmadan{at}yahoo.com

Naveen Dhawan, BA

Section of Minimally Invasive Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee

David S. Tichansky, MD, FACS

Section of Minimally Invasive Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee

Jason Harper, MD

Paris Surgical Specialists, PLLC, Paris, Tennessee

Introduction. It seems that public perception is that physicians receive substantial payments for procedures. This investigation explores patient perception and opinion of Medicare reimbursements to surgeons related to laparoscopic surgery. Our hypothesis was that patients think the surgeon Medicare fee schedule is higher than actuality. Methods. Patients filled out an IRB exempted survey. The survey included a written description of laparoscopic gastric bypass, laparoscopic adjustable gastric band placement, laparoscopic cholecystectomy and an initial patient visit for 30 minutes. All participants were asked to give their thoughts of what Medicare currently reimburses for these procedures as well as what the payment should be. The survey also asked other questions about reimbursement related to Medicare. Results. There were 96 participants in the investigation with 43% of patients not filling in reimbursements for at least one procedure. Most patients (88%) looked at their bills from physicians and insurance companies carefully. For each procedure, the mean reimbursements were approximately 10 times higher than the patient perception of both the amount Medicare currently pays and the amount Medicare should pay compared to the actual fee. For the initial patient visit, the patients overestimated the payment by 158% and thought the Medicare should pay 199% of the actual fee. Most of the patients (98%) thought Medicare should pay more for more difficult cases and 85% thought Medicare should pay more if the patient visits the surgeon more times during the global period. While 32% of the patients feel Medicare pay physicians well, 91% thought that Medicare should increase fees. Conclusion. Most of our patients overestimated what Medicare currently pays for some laparoscopic procedures. Surgeons need to do a better job in educating patients and the general public about the Medicare fee schedule.

Key Words: Medicare fee schedule • laparoscopy • patient perception • bariatric surgery • cholecystectomy • payment

This version was published on December 1, 2008

Surgical Innovation, Vol. 15, No. 4, 302-306 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1553350608323725


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement