This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Blumberg, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Blumberg, D. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Is Operative Conversion Necessary for Patients Diagnosed With Dense Adhesions During an Elective Laparoscopic Colectomy?

University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and Bandaid Surgery, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, davidsurg{at}aol.com

Laparoscopic colectomy is often complicated by adhesions. Studies examining the morbidity of laparoscopic lysis of adhesions (LOA) combined with colectomy are sparse. Objectives. The goal of this study was to prospectively evaluate the results of using the harmonic scalpel to lyse adhesions in patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy. Methods. Laparoscopic colectomy was performed in 83 patients between November 2003 and April 2007. A total of 20 patients underwent laparoscopic colectomy with LOA and 53 patients underwent laparoscopic colectomy alone. Patients were prospectively followed to determine operative time (OT), blood loss, operative conversion, length of stay (LOS), and 30-day morbidity. Results. Operative conversion was 2%, mean estimated blood loss (EBL) was 95 ± 84 mL, and mean OT was 220 ± 64 minutes. There were no anastomotic leaks or perioperative mortalities. There were 9 major complications (11%). Patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy with LOA (n = 20) compared with patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy alone (n = 63) had similar conversion rates (5% vs 2%), EBL (115 ± 108 vs 88 ± 74 mL), and major complications (15% vs 10%), but prolonged minor complications (25% vs 6%) and LOS (6.0 ± 3.0 vs 4.6 ± 1.5 days). Conclusions. Laparoscopic LOA combined with colectomy leads to similar conversion rates and major morbidity compared to laparoscopic colectomy alone.

Key Words: laparoscopic colectomy • adhesions • conversion

Surgical Innovation, Vol. 15, No. 3, 213-218 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1553350608322101


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?