SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Surgical Innovation
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ponsky, L. E.
Right arrow Articles by Novick, A. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ponsky, L. E.
Right arrow Articles by Novick, A. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Renal Radiosurgery: Initial Clinical Experience With Histological Evaluation

Lee E. Ponsky, MD

Center for Urologic Oncology and Minimally Invasive Therapies, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, lee.ponsky{at}uhhospitals.org

Arul Mahadevan, MD

Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Ohio

Indebir S. Gill, MD

Glickman Urological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Ohio

Toufik Djemil, PhD

Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Ohio

Andrew C. Novick, MD

Glickman Urological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Ohio

The purpose of this study was to determine whether radiosurgical technology can be safely applied to renal tumors. Patients received radiosurgical treatment of renal lesions. At 8 weeks after radiosurgical treatment, patients underwent a partial or radical nephrectomy and histologic evaluation. The patients received a radiation dose of 4 Gy per fraction for 4 fractions. Patients were followed, and radiation-induced toxicities were noted. Three patients were treated for a minimum of 1 year of follow-up. All patients completed the treatments, tolerating each of the 4 fractions with no adverse events. No acute toxicities or changes in renal function were noted. None of the patients had any evidence of acute radiation injury or toxicity noted at the time of surgery or within the subsequent 12 months after the radiosurgical treatment. The last patient treated was found to have a cavity with no microscopic evidence of viable tumor after radiosurgical treatment; pathology was consistent with necrotic renal cell carcinoma, papillary type. The other 2 tumors demonstrated pathologic evidence of viable renal cell carcinoma (grade I and grade II). Tumor size remained relatively unchanged for 8 weeks after the radiosurgical treatment in all patients. The authors are extremely encouraged and cautiously optimistic with the initial results. Radiosurgery for renal tumors appears to be safe at this initial dose level.

Key Words: renal cancer • ablation • radiation • radiosurgery

Surgical Innovation, Vol. 14, No. 4, 265-269 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1553350607310546


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement