This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Smith, C. D. Articles by Skandalakis, J. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Smith, C. D. Articles by Skandalakis, J. E. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Remote Presence Proctoring by Using a Wireless Remote-Control Videoconferencing System

Department of Surgery, H-124, Emory University School of Medicine, 1364 Clifton Rd., Atlanta, GA 30322 csmit27{at}emory.edu

John E. Skandalakis, MD, Phd

Centers for Surgical Anatomy and Technique, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.

Remote presence in an operating room to allow an experienced surgeon to proctor a surgeon has been promised through robotics and telesurgery solutions. Although several such systems have been developed and commercialized, little progress has been made using telesurgery for anything more than live demonstrations of surgery. This pilot project explored the use of a new videoconferencing capability to determine if it offers advantages over existing systems. The video conferencing system used is a PC-based system with a flat screen monitor and an attached camera that is then mounted on a remotely controlled platform. This device is controlled from a remotely placed PC-based videoconferencing system computer outfitted with a joystick. Using the public Internet and a wireless router at the client site, a surgeon at the control station can manipulate the videoconferencing system. Controls include navigating the unit around the room and moving the flat screen/camera portion like a head looking up/down and righttleft. This system (InTouch Medical, Santa Barbara, CA) was used to proctor medical students during an anatomy class cadaver dissection. The ability of the remote surgeon to effectively monitor the students' dissections and direct their activities was assessed subjectively by students and surgeon. This device was very effective at providing a controllable and interactive presence in the anatomy lab. Students felt they were interacting with a person rather than a video screen and quickly forgot that the surgeon was not in the room. The ability to move the device within the environment rather than just observe the environment from multiple fixed camera angles gave the surgeon a similar feel of true presence. A remote-controlled videoconferencing system provides a more real experience for both student and proctor. Future development of such a device could greatly facilitate progress in implementation of remote presence proctoring.

Key Words: telesurgery • remote-controlled videoconferencing • remote presence proctoring

Surgical Innovation, Vol. 12, No. 2, 139-143 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/155335060501200212


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Sereno, D. Mutter, B. Dallemagne, C.D. Smith, and J. Marescaux Telementoring for Minimally Invasive Surgical Training by Wireless Robot Surgical Innovation, September 1, 2007; 14(3): 184 - 191. [Abstract] [PDF]