This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Cuesta, M. A. Articles by Meijer, S. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Cuesta, M. A. Articles by Meijer, S. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Minimally Invasive Esophageal Resection

Department of Surgery, Vrije Universiteit Medical Centre (VUMC), Amsterdam, The Netherlands; DVU Medisch Centrum, Department of Surgery, Postbus 7057, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; ma.cuesta{at}vumc.nl

Wim T. van den Broek, MD, PhD

Donald L. van der Peet, MD, PhD

Sijbren Meijer, MD, PhD

Department of Surgery, Vrije Universiteit Medical Centre (VUMC), Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Esophagus resection is the adequate treatment for some benign esophageal diseases, especially caustic and peptic stenosis and end-stage motility dysfunction. However, the most frequent indications for esophageal resection are the high-grade dysplasia of Barrett esophagus and nonmetasta-sized esophageal cancer. Different procedures have been developed to perform esophageal resection given the 5-year survival rate among operated patients of only 18%. The disadvantage of the conventional approach is the high morbidity rate, especially with pulmonary complications. Minimally invasive esophageal resections, which were first performed in 1991, may reduce this important morbidity and preserve the oncologic outcome. The first reports of morbidity and respiratory complications with this approach were discouraging and it seemed likely that the procedure would have to be abandoned. However, in the last 5 years, an important impetus for these techniques was given by Japanese groups and the group of Luketich in Pittsburgh. The outcomes of these new series are different than those of the beginning period, leading to an enormous expansion worldwide. Important factors for this change are the standardization of the operative technique, the experience of many surgeons with more advanced laparoscopic procedures, important improvements in instruments for dissection and division of tissues, a better anesthesia technique, and a better selection of patients for operation. Two minimally invasive techniques are being perfected: the three-stage operation by right thoracoscopy and laparoscopy, and the transhiatal laparoscopic approach. It seems that the first approach may be applied successfully for any tumor in the esophagus, whereas the transhiatal seems ideal for distal esophageal and esophagogastric junction tumors. This review paper discusses all these aspects, with special attention for indications and operative technique.

Surgical Innovation, Vol. 11, No. 3, 147-160 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/107155170401100304


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?