SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Surgical Innovation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schultz, L. S.
Right arrow Articles by Hickok, D. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Schultz, L. S.
Right arrow Articles by Hickok, D. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Transabdominal Preperitoneal Procedure

Leonard S. Schultz, MD

Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN

John Cartuill, FPLACS

Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN

John N Graber, MD

Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN

David F. Hickok, MD

Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN

The technique of transperitoneal inguinal herniorrhaphy evolved its principles for success through the process of continuous quality improvement. Between December 21, 1989 and December 20,1993,278 patients had repair of 348 inguinal and/ or femoral hernias using any of four transperitoneal methods. Group I had mesh repair of only the visualized defect; Group II had mesh support of the entire inguinofemoral area; Group III had staple fixation of mesh as in Group I; whereas Group IV had staple fixation of mesh as in Group II. Recurrence rates were 23% in Group I at 4 years, Group II had 6% at 31/2 years, Group III had 33% at 3 years, and Group 4 had 0% at 3 years. On average, patients returned to unrestricted activity in 4.5 days. The most significant complication was that of small bowel obstruction secondary to partial or complete peritoneal flap dehiscence. These continuously scrutinized data resulted in elucidation of the principles of successful repair. They include, complete dissection and mesh coverage of the entire inguinofemoral area regardless 'of where the visualized defect presents, staple fixation of mesh to prevent its displacement, and close reapproximation of the peritoneal edges. For the past 3 years, adherence to these principles has resulted in 0% recurrence rates and prompt resumption of activity.

Key Words: Close reapproximation of peritoneum • polypropylene mesh • staple fixation • transabdominal preperitoneal herniorrhapy.

Surgical Innovation, Vol. 1, No. 2, 98-105 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/155335069400100204


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement